|
IAFF Calls for Halt to Air Force Staffing Cuts
October 17, 2007 --The IAFF delivered a
strong letter of warning to Secretary of Defense Robert
Gates urging the reversal of fire fighter layoffs currently
taking place at Air Force installations until IAFF concerns
about the staffing reduction and its ramifications for Air
Force fire protection nationwide are addressed.
As a result of a 2005 budget directive from the White House,
the Air Force is in the process of cutting as many as 920
fire fighters who protect Air Force assets and personnel,
including 250 civilians, to pay for more aircraft. To
accommodate these cuts, the Air Force has also initiated an
overhaul of its fire protection standards and policies.
The letter from IAFF General President Harold Schaitberger
demands that the cuts be suspended until the Secretary of
Defense meets with the IAFF to ensure that the union’s
concerns are addressed. “If the reductions are carried out,
the Air Force is in danger of violating Department of
Defense (DoD) Fire and Emergency Services (FES) Program
regulations and National Fire Protection Association (NFPA)
standards,” Schaitberger wrote. The cuts expose “Air Force
assets and personnel to unprecedented and unacceptable
levels of risk.”
The IAFF has been working with its allies on Capitol Hill to
attempt to reverse the planned cuts, but the Air Force has
not been deterred. Members of Congress who represent Air
Force installations, including Armed Services Committee
members Senator John Warner (R-VA) and Representative Jim
Saxton (R-NJ), have raised questions about the Air Force
cuts to no avail.
“The Air Force cuts could have detrimental effects on fire
protection at our nation’s Air Force installations,
including significant increases in incident response times,”
says IAFF 16th District Vice President Jim Johnson. “For
example, at Robins Air Force Base in Georgia, instead of
dispatching one engine with four fire fighters, one ladder
truck with four fire fighters, one rescue truck with three
fire fighters, and one command truck to an incident, under
the proposed reduction, only one truck will initially
respond. That’s unacceptable.”
|